Header
 
 
UN Will React if Clinton Repeats Iran Statements if in Office
Rate This Article:
0

UN Will React if Clinton Repeats Iran Statements if in Office

By Rima Abdelkader

 

UNITED NATIONS, 02 May 2008:

 

Following Iran’s United Nations Mission letter to both the United Nations Security Council and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on United States Senator Hillary Clinton’s recent statement on Iran on ABC News, Ban’s spokesperson Ferhan Haq told me on Friday, “If she [Hillary Clinton] becomes president and she keeps saying that, then we’ll have to react,” when I followed up on the U.N.’s position.

 

Iran’s U.N. ambassador Mehdi Danesh-Yazdi in the letter partially quoted Clinton’s remarks on ABC News to correspondent Chris Cuomo on 22 April: “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the President we will attack Iran,” she said. 

 

“In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them,” Clinton added to Cuomo, not included in the letter. 

 

Clinton said this in response to how she would respond if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons—context the Iranian ambassador unspecified in his letter or assumed Ban and the 15-member council was cognizant of when he cited it as “the interview on ABC news Channel on 22 April 2008.”  See my story.

 

UK’s U.N. ambassador John Sawers, U.N. Security Council president for the month of May, told the U.N. press on Friday when asked on the Iranian letter, “The government of Iran has circulated a letter, has sent a letter and it has been circulated setting out his government’s concerns on that question.  I have no comment to make on that statement by a candidate in the U.S. presidential election.  I think it would be invidious to do so.”

 

Rima Abdelkader is a journalist based at the United Nations and can be reached at rima.abdelkader@gmail.com.
Post A Comment
* Indicates required information
Comment Title:
* Comments:
Nickname:
* Validation:
Comments 9 comments for this article
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Added: May 04, 2008. 09:07 AM CST
Poor Bill
Bill must have flipped out after hearing what she said. Now this is really important becuase it deals with foriegn policy and not something that some crazy reverend said. I am surprised that everyone is taking what she said so lightly. We haven't even ended this debacle in Iraq and now we're about to bomb Iran??
Arabisto
Added: May 04, 2008. 07:00 AM CST
Take another swig of whiskey there Hil
Umm yeah that was a real smart thing to say. She must have had that interview after she went drinking with her voting block in good ol' Pennsylvania. The more I think about it the more Ralph Nader is looking compared to these other shmucks running .... nice job at looking like a moron Hil. You just ruined it for yourself. Why don't you morve to Texas and buy some cowgirl boots and hats while your at it. MORON!
Arabisto
Added: May 04, 2008. 06:49 AM CST
She is pandering
She is saying the most inflammatory things she can say and she is making a dangerous mistake. Does she think people are not listening to the campaign in other parts of the world? Does she think Iran, Syria -- even Israel -- is not tuned in? Does she think that only the most radical elements of the Israeli man-on-the-street counts? Is she trying to out Hagee Hagee? We don't need a hothead in the White House. We already are victims of Bush's Oedipal problems and his attempt to prove to Mama that he is more man than Papa. We don't need someone rattling sabres yet again. If she is trying to prove that she's more man than Obama is, she is wasting our time. She needs to go away now.
Arabisto
Added: May 04, 2008. 06:20 AM CST
peaceful nuclear program?
Iran would be laughing instead of protesting to the UN if Iran's nuclear program actually were peaceful, as it claims. Hillary Clinton is not the head of state of any country. She is not even an official US Presidential candidate (she's still vying for her party's nomination). So Iran imagines a world where it has the right to censor a private citizen of a foreign country for saying something Iran doesn't like? What about all the 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel' statements coming from the leaders of Iran's government? Looks like someone can dish it out but can't take it.
Arabisto
Added: May 04, 2008. 04:45 AM CST
Imbecilic is an understatement
The reprecussions of these remarks will surely hurt her aspirations. Sorry to say, but you lot seem to choose an odd bunch to run your country?
Arabisto
Added: May 03, 2008. 04:45 AM CST
What?
This person is not even president yet and is threatening to bomb countries? What happened to the United States? All it's leaders seem so trigger happy these days. No wonder the country is suffering from so much troubles. Even the currency is worth nothing now. I hope that the Americans rethink the decisions on who they vote for. It seems like Mrs. Clinton is very different and the opposite of her husband Bill.
Arabisto
Added: May 02, 2008. 03:13 PM CST
Unacceptable Comments
Hers are totally irresponsible and imbecilic comments. That is why this woman is the hero of the uneducated and ignorant demographic of the populace.
Arabisto
Added: May 02, 2008. 12:44 PM CST
I don't understand how Mrs. Clinton can threaten to obliterate Iran and get retaliation from the UN, when Iran itself threatens to wipe Israel off the face of the planet? I wonder where the UN's priorities are...?
Arabisto
Added: May 02, 2008. 11:32 AM CST
She is stupid
What a stupid comment to say. I hope no one will vote for her after this comments!
Arabisto
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Google